Interesting post and observations, Sarah. Not sure who is behind Spines, but I'd say "buyer beware". I do a lot of reading, writing, and research - fiction and non-fiction - and I have to say that ChatGPT4 is a phenomenal digging and idea-bouncing tool. It's crap at creativity other than the odd Limerick, but that's not its purpose, nor should it be, at this stage of AI revolution. What interests me is where the puck is going.
I agree that GPT4.0 is a game-changer for research, especially the specialized ones (I use Scholar AI regularly). I created a private GPT and I’ll write a separate post about that. Funny (so to speak), I’ve noticed GPT doesn’t understand humour other than wordplay (like limericks). I’m glad there are still some qualities unique to humans!
Interesting post and observations, Sarah. Not sure who is behind Spines, but I'd say "buyer beware". I do a lot of reading, writing, and research - fiction and non-fiction - and I have to say that ChatGPT4 is a phenomenal digging and idea-bouncing tool. It's crap at creativity other than the odd Limerick, but that's not its purpose, nor should it be, at this stage of AI revolution. What interests me is where the puck is going.
I agree that GPT4.0 is a game-changer for research, especially the specialized ones (I use Scholar AI regularly). I created a private GPT and I’ll write a separate post about that. Funny (so to speak), I’ve noticed GPT doesn’t understand humour other than wordplay (like limericks). I’m glad there are still some qualities unique to humans!